Product finder

Find the right product fast

Recommended models0 results

No matching model found. Try another keyword, or contact an engineer directly.

Skip to main content
锎锔New Material Technology锎锔New Material Technology锎锔新材料科技
锎锔 · Site Navigation

Making dispersion more efficient.

Home/News Center/Californium Curium R915 Polyester-Grade Transparent Halogen-Free Flame Retardant: Technical Data Sheet and Processing Window

Product updates · 27 September 2026

Californium Curium R915 Polyester-Grade Transparent Halogen-Free Flame Retardant: Technical Data Sheet and Processing Window

R915 is a transparent halogen-free flame retardant developed specifically for PET/PETG, and belongs to the flame retardant series. This article lists the core composition (polyol phosphate ester), key physical and chemical indicators (phosphorus content 18%, melting point 210℃, onset temperature of thermal decomposition ≥260℃), tiered dosage (V-2 1%–2% / V-0 2%–4%) and processing temperature window on the basis of the source documentation. It also compares the frequently asked questions about yellowing / whitening / exudation in transparent articles against the source text item by item, and defines the model-selection boundary between R915, R912 and R912B. Each data item is annotated with the source document name and data basis.

  1. 01Anti-agglomeration
  2. 02Distribution rate
  3. 03Lubrication balance
Californium Curium R915 Polyester-Grade Transparent Halogen-Free Flame Retardant: Technical Data Sheet and Processing Window

Moved from the bodyKey sentence (original text, as is)

transparent halogen-free flame retardants
In the category overview of version 1.09, R915 and R912 are listed side by side under “transparent halogen-free flame retardants”. (Based on official product data)
Frame-by-frameTrend of light transmission aperture in this article

Gradually expand the light transmission band frame by frame according to the light transmission aperture in this article: bandwidth expands with rolling extension, corresponding to the "light transmission unaffected" entry in the reference materials.Scroll-driven, animated frame by frame with requestAnimationFrame; when the system requests reduced motion or the screen is narrow, the final frame is shown directly.

R915 is a transparent halogen-free flame retardant developed specifically for PET/PETG by Californium Curium, and belongs to the flame retardant series. The core component is polyol phosphate ester (an additive-type organophosphorus system, halogen-free and free of heavy metals). It appears as a white crystalline fine powder, with a phosphorus content of 18%, a melting point of 210℃, and an onset temperature of thermal decomposition ≥260℃. It is an additive-type flame retardant and does not participate in the polyester copolymerization reaction. With a fineness expressed as a 325-mesh pass rate ≥98%, it is recommended for use within a barrel temperature window of 240–275℃. Each data item below is annotated with the source document name and data basis.

“Who we are” on this article: Californium Curium’s additives are organized into three lines—dispersants (with chemical dispersion as the main line, represented by the R1800 series paste-form hyperdispersants; used in combination with wetting-type dispersion agents such as wax, stearic acid and EBS (ethylene bis-stearamide) to raise dispersibility to a new level [company statement]), the flame retardant series to which R915 belongs, and the comprehensive series. R915 addresses one specific question: how to make polyester transparent and halogen-free flame retardant. It does not address dispersion problems.

Model positioning

Figure 1The price of transparency has to be judged on a real part, and that sheet in the frame is what the light transmission is compared on.

The documentation defines it as follows:

A high-efficiency halogen-free flame retardant developed specifically for PET and PETG high-transparency polyester materials. It has no negative impact on the light transmittance or haze of the base resin, does not cause whitening, yellowing or exudation during processing, and is perfectly suited to high-transparency finished articles such as transparent sheet, film, injection-moulded optical parts and extruded profiles.

(Based on official product data)

Three frequently asked questions about transparent articles: yellowing, whitening and exudation

A section of semi-transparent, light-colored tubing lies horizontally on a light-colored tabletop, with the outline of the inner wall visible through the tube wall and flat cut surfaces at both ends.
Figure 2The cost of transparency must be judged by examining actual objects; the transparent component itself is the best point of comparison.

These three terms are the most common customer complaints for transparent polyester articles. The documentation provides a qualitative commitment plus processing boundaries for R915, which can be checked item by item:

Phenomenon (customer's wording)Source text on R915Source
“The moulded part comes out yellow”“Does not cause whitening, yellowing or exudation during processing”; boundary on the reverse side: “prolonged residence at temperatures above 290℃ is prohibited, to avoid slight thermal degradation of the flame retardant causing yellowing”Official product data
“Transparency dropped, with fogging / rainbow patterns”“The molecular structure matches the polarity of polyester; after addition, the haze of the finished article does not increase and the light transmittance does not decline; the finished product remains highly transparent, with no whitening, fogging or rainbow pattern problems”Official product data
“Surface exudation, oily fog”“High-molecular-weight polyol phosphate ester structure; no blooming and no exudation at room temperature or under 85℃/85% RH hygrothermal ageing; no oily fog on the finished article surface”Official product data

The boundary must be clearly stated: all three rows above are qualitative statements. The documentation provides no corresponding percentage values for light transmittance, haze or yellowing, and does not present any comparative test data for these three items. This article does not convert qualitative descriptions into numerical values. If your acceptance criteria are specific numerical values (e.g. haze ≤X%, ΔYI ≤Y), you need to conduct trials and measurements using your own resin and wall thickness.

Core composition

The documentation describes the composition verbatim as follows:

Polyol phosphate ester (additive-type organophosphorus system, halogen-free and free of heavy metals)

(Based on official product data)

This product is an additive-type flame retardant and does not participate in the polyester copolymerization reaction.
The [Remarks] column states one key boundary: “This product is an additive-type flame retardant and does not participate in the polyester copolymerization reaction.” (Based on official product data)

Not listed in the documentation: molecular weight, degree of polymerization, the chemical environment of phosphorus (e.g. whether it is a phosphate ester oligomer), and specific structural differences from other phosphorus-based flame retardants. The documentation also provides no elemental spectrum other than bromine/chlorine, and no quantitative composition table.

Key parameter table

The following table is taken item by item from the [Key physical and chemical indicators] section of the documentation; the test standard column is also reproduced as written:

Key parameter …
Test itemTechnical parametersTest standardSource
AppearanceWhite crystalline fine powderVisual inspectionOfficial product data
Phosphorus content18%Phosphorus elemental analysisSame as above
Melting point210℃DSC differential scanning calorimetrySame as above
Halogen contentNot detected (halogen-free)IEC 61249-2-21Same as above
Onset temperature of thermal decomposition≥260℃TGA thermogravimetric analysisSame as above
Moisture≤0.2%GB/T 6284Same as above
Fineness (325-mesh pass rate)≥98%Sieving methodSame as above
CompatibilityFully compatible with PET and PETG, does not affect transparencyLight transmission test on extruded specimensSame as above
This table has 8 rows × 4 columns, each row traced to the source; on narrow screens the table scrolls sideways.

Items not listed in the documentation (not supplemented or inferred in this article): specific values for light transmittance and haze, limiting oxygen index (LOI) values, melt flow rate, volume resistivity, toxicity data (LD50), UL yellow card number, or third-party test report numbers.

phosphorus content 18%
Among these, the two items “phosphorus content 18%” and “onset temperature of thermal decomposition ≥260℃” have clear test methods and can be entered directly into a technical evaluation sheet; whereas the row “does not affect transparency” is a qualitative statement, and the documentation provides no corresponding percentage value for light transmittance. This article does not convert qualitative descriptions into numerical values.
limiting oxygen index (LOI) increased to above 38%
(Adjacent fact for comparison: the R912B page in the same volume states “limiting oxygen index (LOI) increased to above 38%”—that is another model and another system, and cannot be applied to R915; the R915 page only states “oxygen index significantly increased”, without any numerical value.)

Recommended dosage and typical applications

Same-unit interval band

Same-dimension range intersection (% · 2 objects)

Dimension · %

X-axis = dimension %; colored band = target interval where the object can fall; points outside the band = portions that cannot be reached.

01.252.53.755%Target band012345UL94 V-21–2%UL94 V-02–4%X-axis same dimension % ·X-axis scale based on this article's max (1–4 %); do not directly compare lengths across articles.
  • Target band
  • UL94 V-2
  • UL94 V-0
  • X-axis same dimension % ·
  • X-axis scale based on this article's max (1–4 %); do not directly compare lengths across articles.
  • UL94 V-21–2 %
  • UL94 V-02–4 %
Chart data (source text verbatim)
ObjectRange
UL94 V-21–2 %
UL94 V-02–4 %

Source textScale 0–5 %

Limit scale

Halogen-free criterion ppm red line

Dimension · ppm

Scale = criterion limit (unit ppm); the side marked in red = exceedance direction; values are taken directly from source criteria.

Both tiers satisfiedNeither tier satisfied025050075010001250ppmBr+Cl < 900 ppm…Fig. Halogen-free criterion ppm red line← Lower value means more "halogen-free"; dashed line = red line from source, segment = judgment interval cut by red lineClaim permitted only below the red line: Halogen-free threshold
  • Br+Cl < 900 ppm
  • Fig. Halogen-free criterion ppm red line
  • ← Lower value means more "halogen-free"; dashed line = red line from source, segment = judgment interval cut by red line
  • Claim permitted only below the red line:
  • Br+Cl< 900 ppm
Chart data (source text verbatim)
CriterionLimitDescription
Br+Cl< 900 ppmCriterion: Br+Cl 900 ppm

Main text criteria layerScale 0–900 ppm

Moved from the bodyConfirm before selection: Is TPU in the substrate? · whole paragraph

  1. Whether TPU is present in the substrate: R912’s applicable substrates explicitly include TPU, while R915 and R912B only list PET/PETG (R912B only lists PET). For TPU, the documentation supports only R912.
  2. Whether the article is a high-transparency product: R915’s transparency statement is “does not affect transparency”; R912’s is “light transmittance loss approx. 20%”; R912B has no transparency statement. For optical parts and high-transparency films, the documentation points to R915.
  3. Processing temperature window: R915 states barrel 240–275℃ and prohibits long-term retention above 290℃; R912B states recommended 230–280℃. If the line temperature is near the upper limit, the two models differ in their statements and should be selected according to your own measured temperature.

Recommended dosage (reproduced verbatim, including tiered conditions):

Target flame retardant ratingArticle thicknessRecommended dosage
UL94 V-21.5 mm1%–2%
UL94 V-01.0–1.5 mm2%–4%

The document further notes: a small amount of phosphorus-nitrogen synergist may be added as needed to reduce the dosage, without affecting transparency throughout the process. (Based on official product data)

Processing window (reproduced verbatim):

Extrusion/injection moulding barrel temperature: 240–275℃
Die/mould temperature
60–90℃
Long-term retention above 290℃ is prohibited to avoid mild thermal degradation and yellowing of the flame retardant

Mixing points (reproduced verbatim): Dry PET/PETG substrate at 120℃ for 4–6 h in advance; moisture ≤0.03%; high-speed mix R915 with PET/PETG pellets for 5–8 min; use a low-shear polyester-specific screw; a 20%–30% concentration PET/PETG flame retardant masterbatch may be prepared first.

(Based on official product data)

Typical applications (reproduced verbatim): transparent PET/PETG injection-moulded articles (lamp housings, transparent electronic enclosures, cosmetic packaging, instrument viewing windows); extruded transparent sheet/board (advertising light-transmitting panels, decorative transparent sheet/board, equipment protective panels); cast PET film, high-transparency flame-retardant packaging film, optical protective film; transparent flame-retardant polyester pipe, profiles, and 3D printing PETG filament. (Based on official product data)

Packaging and storage: 25 kg composite woven bag with inner PE liner; cool, dry warehouse; temperature ≤30℃; sealed and moisture-proof; shelf life 12 months; transported as ordinary chemical non-hazardous goods. (Based on official product data)

Environmental compliance statement (reproduced verbatim; this section is the original text in the documentation, not an inference drawn in this article):

Halogen-free
meets the IEC 61249 halogen-free standard, Br+Cl < 900ppm, total halogen < 1500ppm;
RoHS 2.0
does not contain lead, mercury, cadmium, hexavalent chromium, polybrominated biphenyls (PBB), or polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE);
REACH
does not contain SVHC substances of very high concern;
Combustion behaviour
halogen-free low smoke; does not generate toxic dioxin-type products.

(Based on official product data)

How to choose among comparable products

halogen-free flame retardant
In the flame retardant series, under the “halogen-free flame retardant” category there are also R911 (PE halogen-free flame retardant), R912 (transparent halogen-free flame retardant), R912B (PET halogen-free flame retardant) and R940 (reactive type). Below are 4 facts that can be directly compared in the documentation, all from the respective body pages:
ModelDosage basis
R915UL94 V-2(1.5mm) 1%–2%; V-0(1.0–1.5mm) 2%–4%
R912TPU 2%–7% (polyester type 2–4%, polyether type 5–7%); PETG / PET 1.5%–3% each
R912B1.5%–5%
ModelApplicable substrateTransparency-related statementThermal decomposition/processing temperature
R915PET, PETG“Completely compatible with PET and PETG, does not affect transparency” (extruded sample light transmittance test)Onset temperature of thermal decomposition ≥260℃; barrel 240–275℃
R912PET, PETG, TPU“Substrate light transmittance loss approx. 20%”Thermal decomposition temperature ≥285℃
R912BPET— (documentation does not list a transparency statement)Recommended 230–280℃

(Based on official product data)

Based on this table, 3 selection boundaries can be established:

Areas left open (not listed in the documentation; not compared in this article):

  • R915 and R912 do not have light transmittance values under the same test conditions; therefore, it cannot be concluded “how much more transparent R915 is than R912”, and this article does not make such a comparison.
  • The three products have no same-system LOI or UL94 measured comparison data for flame retardant efficiency.
  • R915’s “phosphorus content 18%” and R912’s “phosphorus content ≥9.8%” are two registered values under different test scopes; the documentation does not state that the two are convertible or comparable.
halogen-free · transparent · synergistic
Corresponding detail pages: R915 · R912 · R912B; for the series scope and the three “halogen-free · transparent · synergistic” lines, see Flame Retardant Series; for the overall description of the halogen-free system, see Three Halogen-free Flame Retardant Lines.

Californium Curium’s main dispersant line: chemical dispersion × wetting-type dispersion

dispersion / agglomeration / gel spot
If you arrived here from the “dispersion / agglomeration / gel spot” route, this section aligns the language: Californium Curium’s dispersants use chemical dispersion, represented by the R1800 series paste-form hyperdispersants (R1800-S / R1800-SK / R1800-SH)—anchoring groups + solvation chains form an encapsulation coating on the surface of pigments and powders, preventing re-agglomeration by steric hindrance (Based on official product data). The wetting-type dispersion commonly used in industry (powdered additives such as wax, stearic acid and EBS, or our R900A) is a different grade. Using the two grades together pushes dispersibility to a new level [company position]; the verifiable point in the documentation is the experimental record of R1800-SH in the same formulation with polyethylene wax (same volume pages 9–10, printed -18-/-19-). The documentation also contains a set of item-by-item comparisons that can be checked verbatim: the original text on the R1800-SK page reads, “The compatibility with all rubbers and plastics is very good; lubricating performance is 26 times that of wax, and dispersing performance is 113 times that of wax”—read literally, this is an item-by-item comparison of “dispersing performance / lubricating performance”, not “overall performance 113 times” (Based on official product data).

Relationship with R915: R915 belongs to the flame retardant line. If a PET/PETG formulation requires both transparent flame retardancy and colour (colour masterbatch/colour paste) at the same time, the two lines are each dosed according to their own TDS, the processing windows are intersected, and a small-scale trial is carried out first.

Technical Documentation and Sample Acquisition

Californium Curium

  • Address: Room 109-110, Building 2, No. 42, Mulun Chuangye 1st Road, Changping Town, Dongguan City, Guangdong Province, China
  • Tel: +86 136 3650 0188
  • E-mail: kj9896@126.com

In the documentation, the Notes state: for finished articles of different thicknesses, equipment and process conditions, and synergistic systems, the dosage may be slightly adjusted; customers are advised to conduct a small-scale trial in advance to determine the optimal formulation. The product technical data are laboratory typical values; please carry out a small-scale trial for verification before mass production.

The documentation contains 2 verbatim statements on the service approach: "Based on the customer's extrusion production equipment, provide the customer with a hyperdispersant suitable for that equipment" and "our company's technical personnel go to the customer's production site to provide the most suitable production process parameters"; when the customer's production is unstable, "our technical personnel will arrive at the customer's site as soon as possible." (Based on official product data)

If UL Yellow Cards, third-party test reports, or measured data matched to a specific resin system are required, please request them from the technical party via the contact details above — the public documentation on this site does not contain such document numbers.

Data and Basis Notes

All parameters and descriptions in this article come from official product data; items not listed in the official materials are annotated individually in the article. This article contains no prices, customer names, certificate numbers or performance commitments; the publicly available materials on this site contain no third-party test-report numbers — for such documents, please contact the technical team.

Data basis

Every figure in this article has an official product data basis; prices, customer names and certificate numbers are not included.

Samples / selection

Recommendations are given for your substrate, equipment and target grade; the same resin system on different equipment can lead to different conclusions.

Technical enquiries

For UL Yellow Cards or third-party test report numbers, please contact our technical team; this public site does not carry such document numbers.

Technical data are typical laboratory values; please validate them in a small-scale trial before mass production.

Having read this far, one of three things usually comes next.

  • Describe your formulation to meBase polymer, flame retardant type and loading, processing temperature — give me those three and I can help you judge dispersant selection and dosage range.
  • Ask for the data tablesEvery figure in this article cites its source page; name the table and I will pull it.
  • See the R1800-SK / R900A specsPhysical properties, compatibility scope and the base polymers each covers are on their product pages.

Kaicu New Materials · Functional Additives

Article actions

If this piece was useful, you can leave a mark — the like count comes from our back office at admin.kj9896.com; when the endpoint is unreachable the buttons are disabled and the count shows “—”. No invented figures are ever filled in.

Share toXLinkedInFacebookWhatsAppEmail

Keep reading

More company announcements and product updates are in the newsroom.